22 Sept 2009
TED Tuesday: Future of SETI
17 Sept 2009
Weirdest cosmological theories
Stephen Battersby of New Scientist gives a primer on the 10 most weird cosmological theories put forward by various individuals over the centuries.- Clashing branes
- Evolving universes
- Superfluid space-time
- Goldilocks universe
- Gravity reaches out
- Cosmic ghost
- It's a small universe
- Fast light
- Sterile neutrinos
Reading through these titles would have probably stoked your curiosity enough to click on the link above and read the whole article.
25 Aug 2009
TED Tuesday: Fly me to Saturn
Carolyn Porco shares exciting new findings from the Cassini spacecraft's recent sweep of one of Saturn's moons, Enceladus. Samples gathered from the moon's icy geysers hint that an ocean under its surface could harbor life.
4 Aug 2009
TED Tuesday: Our "queer" Universe
30 Jul 2009
Hubble sees "bubble"
The "Cygnus Bubble" nebula may actually be a cylinder that is being seen from one of its ends. This image was taken with the Kitt Peak Mayall 4-metre telescope in Arizona (Image: Travis A. Rector/U of Alaska Anchorage/Heidi Schweiker/NOAO)]IT LOOKS like a soap bubble or perhaps even a camera fault, but the image at right is a newly discovered planetary nebula. [...] The bubble, which was officially named PN G75.5+1.7 last week, has been there a while. [...] "It's a beautiful example," says Adam Frank of the University of Rochester, New York. "Spherical ones are very rare." One explanation is that the image is looking down the throat of a typical cylindrical nebula. However, it is still remarkably symmetrical, Frank says.
28 Jul 2009
TED Tuesday: Shedding light on Dark matter
26 Jul 2009
Sunday Spotlight: The Virtual Telescope

A few days back I got an invite to join a group on LinkedIn. It was called The Virtual Telescope Project, a name that interested me enough to go ahead and check out what was this all about. And once I was on the website, I knew I had to write a Sunday Spotlight on this particular service provided by the Bellatrix Astronomical Observatory.
The homepage beckons you to enter the website with the message, "Enjoy the real Universe from your desktop, live!". It is available in English and Italian. This project/telescope is a participant in the IYA2009 activities. The website is created and directed by Gianluca Masi. Here you will find out what makes Virtual Telescope a unique case in the world. The Virtual Telescope offers live shows and astronomical Labs, in real-time or with archived material (the latter being free).
I am very much looking forward to participate in their next live show on Monday 3rd August, which is in Italian. But ... the fascinating beauty of the deep space is beyond spoken word.
12 Jul 2009
Sunday Spotlight: Jason Martell and Xfacts
Jason Martell is a researcher and lecturer specialising and interested in connections between ancient knowledge and contemporary science. He has extensively studied the work of Zecharia Sitchin on Sumerian culture and the advanced technology mentioned therein. Jason has also given numerous lectures and presentations on the topic of Planet X (which has been reportedly spotted or at least its presence acknowledged by NASA), the 10th planet in our Solar system and the belief that this is the "Nibiru" of ancient Sumerians. The sites created by him, and collectively represented as Xfacts network, include AncientX.com, Xlectures.com, UfologyExpert.com, UfoStream.com, Mars-Earth.com and Alienscalpel.com. - AncientX.com is a collection of the video of and slides shown during the presentation given by Jason at MUFON, LA. Here he talks about various evidences provided by the Sumerian literature and artifacts that Sumerians knew about people of higher intelligence, originating from outside the Earth, whom they called Anunnaki. He goes on to show how planet Nibiru of Sumerians and its influence on the inner Solar system described by them could make it a very plausible candidate for Planet X that our astronomers are looking for today.
- Xlectures.com is one-stop-resource to all the lectures and interviews given by Jason Martell to the date on various topics of his research, Nibiru/Planet X, ancient astronauts, Sumerian culture and artifacts, the Mars-Earth connection to name a few.
- UfologyExpert.com tells you on its homepage that, "By watching the videos contained on this site, you will learn about some of the most substantial cases in Ufology. Evidence that can prove UFO's are real, and intelligent extraterrestrials have made formal treaties with various governments around the world."
- UfoStream.com, as the name suggests, is a channel to watch innumerable videos concerning the UFOs and aliens. It also gives links to other similarly inclined channels, websites.
- Mars-Earth.com took me to a page very similar to the "site map" page of Xfacts.com so I'm not sure if there's some problem with the link. However, the tab "mars research" on the top navigation bar takes you to a page which contains some really interesting articles and links about structures on Mars (the face on Mars, the pentagonal pyramid complex of Cydonia etc.) and how its been shown that NASA has been altering the images obtained from Mars to make the planet look hostile.
- Alienscalpel.com greets you with the message "This website is the only website dedicated to the victims of the Alien Abduction Phenomenon."
So all I have tried to do in this blog entry is to give an overview of this vastly spread and informative network of sites and research generated by Jason Martell. In few of my blog entries earlier, I have picked some topics connected to Sumerian cosmology, which interest me and written my thoughts on them in some detail. I might write something about the structures on Mars some day. However, I'm not as keen on his other research interests such as UFOs and aliens. I do believe that there are a lot of thigs out there that need to be researched. But as for UFOs and aliens, I think its not the right time yet and hence we're taking it in the wrong direction of sensetionalism.
31 May 2009
Sunday spotlight: The Land of No Horizon
3 Apr 2009
... how I wonder what you are!
I was first going to title this blog “twinkle twinkle little star”. But as I repeated the old nursery rhyme to myself I realised the second line more appropriately captured the essence of astronomy; how I wonder what you are! For eons, we humans have looked up in the night sky I wondered about what the little twinkling wonders were. Depending on our level of scientific and technological advancement it could be simply gazing upward with naked eye and trying to join the dots making imaginary creatures or it could be focusing a humongous telescope array on colliding galaxies to learn about how the universe came about. But the heavenly bodies never stop intriguing us. The branch of science that studies the celestial objects is called ‘astronomy’, from the Greek words astron meaning "star" and nomos meaning "law". 2009 has been declared the International year of astronomy (IYA 2009). I have wanted to write about IYA 2009 for a while but today was a good day to do so. The RTR09 campaign for which I’ve been volunteer blogging lately has nothing scheduled for the next three days so it is a good time for me to get back to my science writing. Also, one of the cornerstone projects for IYA 2009, 100 hours of astronomy, began yesterday. This is a worldwide marathon event that goes on for 100 hours straight and astronomers and lovers of astronomy organise and participate in various events around the globe dedicated to astronomy for these 100 hours. A special 24 hour-long webcast is going to be broadcasted that will take you on the tour around the world in 80 telescopes starting 9am UT today. It will include interviews of scientist at these facilities, their overview and some views of what one can see from these on-land and in-orbit telescopes. It starts in about 30 minutes so tune in fast!
23 Mar 2009
Earth Hour 2009: My way!
This is the video I made for the 12secondTV Earth Hour challenge. I also have it up on my YT channel.
5 Mar 2009
Son of God or Sun of God?
I few days back I came across a very interesting series of three videos on YT. I do not believe in “practising” any religion, I believe in “believing” and acknowledging the presence of a higher power whose nature and influence we haven’t yet been able to comprehend. Therefore, I watched these videos merely out of curiosity. It is a novel approach to explaining the similarities between Gods and messengers of various religions. I’m not sure whether the person uploading these videos actually agrees or disagrees with these videos. The title and description is confusing. Also, not all information presented is correct. I know that Krishna, the Hindu god, was not born of a virgin as the video claims. So you might find some other such mistakes in it.
I do not mean to offend anyone or their religious beliefs. If you think this is rubbish, that’s fine by me. If you believe this to be absolutely true, that’s fine too. I’m not going to try and convince you either ways because I do not know myself whether it is right or wrong. I know, however, that it is something different. And that’s why I found it interesting enough to share.
20 Feb 2009
Sumerian cosmology
[Image source: Zecharia Sitchin's wesbite]This blog entry was originally going to be a summary of Zecharia Sitchin’s research on Sumerian ancient knowledge and cosmogony. However, while researching the internet for his work I came across a few websites which were established with the aim of disproving Sitchin’s work. This wasn’t really surprising as unconventional research is never welcomed with wide arms in the mainstream science. However, as I read the material on the websites (especially one of them), it seemed to me that the author was knowledgeable and was making a sincere effort of setting the record straight rather than simply trying to gain publicity. So now, like a true, rational scientist, I’m going to present a summary of both sides of the story in my blog. And leave it to my readers to decide which one they think is “correct”. Since I have neither read any of Sitchin’s books (my knowhow is based on his website) nor studied Hebrew or Cuneiform script, I’m unable to decide for myself which side to lean towards. But I’m happy that I at least got to know that there are two sides to this story.
Zecharia Sitchin is a well-known name for researchers and followers of ancient knowledge. He first gained fame in 1976 after publishing the book 'The 12th planet' based on a radical new idea that the ancient Sumerian texts, which are considered by scholars as allegorical myths about wars between Gods of the Sumerians, were in fact realistic records of cosmological events. He went on to publish 11 more books, the latest one in 2007, which extend the idea further and delve deeper into the texts and records left behind by the ancient culture of Sumer. He claims to have studied various clay tablets on which the texts in question were scribed in Cuneiform script as well as ancient artefacts found in excavations.
The main idea that sparked Sitchin’s research and publications was the record of a large-scale celestial event in the Mesopotamian Epic of Creation (Enuma Elish). When our solar system was still in formative stage, a rogue planet (Nibiru/Marduk) ejected from another solar system got pulled into ours by gravitational force. It then collided with a planet Tiamat (old Earth) causing it to split apart. Larger part became our Earth as we know today; the other part got spread into the belt of asteroids we see between Mars and Jupiter. Tiamat’s original orbit was between Mars and Jupiter (hence the big gap and asteroid belt between them) which got deflected to the orbit of Earth today. Our Moon was the satellite of Tiamat (Kingu) which remained with the newly formed Earth. The external planet, Nibiru, got captured into a very eccentric orbit into our solar system and hence visits the “inner planets” only once every 3600 years. The advanced life-forms from Nibiru, called the Annunaki, are the reason for technological knowhow and progress of the Homo sapiens on Earth. They visited Earth in ancient times and changed us from cave-dwellers to pyramid-builders. Sitchin’s theories and books received the typical response any esoteric, unconventional research receives; tremendous interest from the general public and no serious attention from the main stream scientists and scholars.
Even today, the criticism continues unabated and some of it seems bolstered by modern research. Linguistic scholar Michael Heiser’s website is one of the best resource of the objections to Sitchin’s translations of the Sumerian cuneiform script as well as his understanding of the texts. The material on his website is well-researched and well-written. As one reads through pages of his various papers one definitely begins to take these “objections” seriously, if not become completely convinced. The “solar system-like” depiction on Sumerian cylinder seal VA 243 is the backbone of Sitchin’s ideas. He claims the depiction shows central Sun and 12 planets around it thus proving Sumerians knew of 12 planets (hence the title of his first book). Heiser shows from his research that this interpretation is wrong and central body is not Sun but a star and so are the other 12 dots. Also, the word “Nibiru” is not used to name a specific planet but more like an adjective according to Heiser. There are further examples of words which are said to be misinterpreted by Sitchin and thus not support his theory. I will leave it to those interested to check out Heiser’s website themselves.
However, what makes Sitchin’s ideas interesting to me is the fact that some of the ideas he put forth decades ago (which in turn Sumerians recorded thousands of years ago) seem to be corroborated by new astronomical findings. The presence of an additional planet/oid in our solar system in the regions far beyond Pluto has been hinted at by modern astronomers. Sitchin’s website claims connection of his ideas to many more modern astronomical discoveries. This is the reason why the whole Planet X/Nibiru research has been taken up by young inquisitors like Jason Martell. Another point that came to my mind (and I’m sure others would have thought of this) was about the size of our Moon. According to Sitchin’s interpretation of Sumerian texts, our Moon was the satellite of Tiamat (Kingu) which remained with the newly formed Earth. Could this explain why the Moon is too big for Earth to be a satellite? May be it was the correct size as satellite for the larger Tiamat? Well, those are just the two cents of my inquisitive mind.
6 Feb 2009
The solar system and beyond
Two very interesting articles came to my attention last week, one about our solar system and the other about the deep space beyond. The article published on the New Scientist website is titled “Our unknown solar system”. It is kind of a compilation of six other articles that appear on the same website. Each of these six articles focuses on one aspect of the solar system that is still a mystery to the humanity.
The first article, How was the solar system built?, gives an insight into the birth of our solar system and of course about the things we do not know certainly about the solar system. The second, Why are the sun and moon the same size in the sky?, talks about eclipses. In the beginning it seemed a little weird to me that this should be a subject of an article. The explanation is too straight forward; the Sun is 400 times larger than the Moon but also 400 times farther. But as I went on to read the article, it became clear that the article focused on the possibility that this might not be a mere coincidence and how the size of the Moon might be responsible for origin of life on Earth. Is there a Planet X? is the third article in the series which, as the title suggests, explores the possibility of an as yet unknown planet on the outskirts of our solar system. The next article, Where do comets come from?, was a bit of a surprise for me as I had thought the astronomers knew the answer to this question. Along with listing what we do not know about the comets, it also gives nice overview of different types of comets and the reasons why it is difficult to spot and study them. The fifth in series is, Is the solar system unique?, which tackles the question in the title and the possibility of the answer being “no” is increasing along with our knowledge of the Universe around us. And lastly, How will the solar system end?, delves into the still-far-into-the-future event of the end of our solar system.
The other article is a contribution by John Roach to the MSNBC website. It talks about the project “From Earth to the Universe” which is one of the several projects organized to mark the International Year of Astronomy (IYA 09). More than 40 countries have agreed to participate in this project and have made 125 images from their respective space agencies for display around the world, in public places like the airports, parks etc. The article shares 10 of these images along with little information snippets about them. It makes a great read for anyone interested in mesmerising images from the outer space, which I think is most of us.
25 Jan 2009
Did Harriot beat Galileo to it?
Thomas Harriot (c. 1560 – 2 July 1621) was an eminent English astronomer, mathematician, ethnographer, and translator. During his lifetime Harriot was known to the world merely as an eminent algebraist but there are evidences now to prove his greatness as an astronomer as well as cartographer. Relevant papers at the West Sussex Record Office show that Harriot drew images of the Moon several months earlier (July 1609) than Galileo Galilee, who is credited for the first telescopic observations and maps of the Moon (December 1609). According to Dr Allan Chapman, a science historian at Oxford University, “Thomas Harriot was not only the first person ever to draw an astronomical body with a telescope on 26 July 1609, he rapidly developed to become an absolutely superb lunar cartographer. Harriot's composite drawing of the Moon - produced in 1612 or 1613 - marked the birth of modern cartography".1 Jan 2009
Antikythera mechanism replicated
A few sponge divers from the Aegean island of Symi discovered an ancient shipwreck more than a century ago by accident by a barren islet called Antikythera. A 10-month expedition sponsored by the Greek government brought back incredible treasures like bronze and marble statues, jewellery, glassware and furniture, including an ornate bronze throne. In all the excitement, nobody noticed a corroded lump of rock found along with these treasures. However, a few months later, it cracked open, revealing traces of gearwheels, precisely marked circular scales and inscriptions in ancient Greek. The battered artifact became known as the "Antikythera mechanism", and it caused excitement and skepticism. Until then, not one gearwheel, pointer or scale had been found to show presence of technology in ancient times and some scholars did not rule out the possibility of a hoax.
The New Scientist has published few informative articles about the mechanism and how it worked. There is also a video (featured above) made by them, and broadcast on YouTube, about the reconstruction of this device. Michael Wright, a former senior curator of the Science Museum in London, has studied the mechanism for decades and has recreated a working model of the ancient computer recently. He explains in the video how the device works with a simple rotation of a handle but also illustrates how complex the inner mechanism is! A must read and see for anyone who thinks that contemporary human beings are the smartest and technologically most advanced that the planet has ever seen.
9 Nov 2008
24 Oct 2008
Hubble - Secrets from space
This is part 1 of 7 part series on YouTube which talks about and shows us how the Hubble space telescope came about and what the humankind has achieved by accomplishing this hugely creditable feat. A must watch for any astronomy/space/science-lover!
